wolfat

allan22, agree, is a nice method. I’m only concerned about MM, too wild for me. Sometimes I play it, but spotting good opportunities, skipping some plays that I think are out from the current trend. A

Here an interesting bet selection that intrigued me, by Patrick from Sweden. Sputniks Optimal March We narrow down the Red & Black outcomes into three formations. Singles are one event by itself Series of two are one event by itself Series of three and higher is one event by itself The Formations Number 2 stand for a series of two. Number 3 stand for a series of three or higher Number 1 stands for singles 222 W 223 W 221 W 232 W 231 W 233 W 211 LW 212 LLW 213 LLL <<< Triplet 333 W 332 W 331 W 323 W 321 W 322 W 311 LW 313 LLW 312 LLL <<< Triplet That is 16 versus 2 favouring our selection. The March 1. You wait for the first series to show then bet that it will follow by a new series. 2. If you lose you bet that you will break even with two singles - see formation table 3. If you lose then you bet against the triplet and if you lose you have three losses. 4. If not you continue betting series follow by series. Illustration R B R B B R RW R B RL BW R B R R R R R B BW R RW R R B RL RL RW B R B R R B BW R BL BL B L <<< Triplet R R Extended Fibonacci 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 4 5 6,5 8 10,5 13 17 21 27,5 34 - (Air Ball Machine & Online Casino) 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 16 21 26 34 42 55 68 - (Real Casino at minimum tables) Last March Rule When you get a triplet you can wait for a new series to show and start over Or you can continue after the current present series Personal I testing both solutions With this part, you need to make up your mind about the decision making At the moment I use a new series and continue with the march YouTube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3sdOlSMdQU Cheers Sputnik The Gambler

nice MM, coupled with the bet selection described in video #4 statistically you should have the same % to get a losing string or a winning one but the end is very different!!! for those who loves an aggressive approach… and sometimes rewarding. A

…go with the flow!

bradh, the aim of those inputs from the web is to offer a kind of different perspectives to our members. every method should be tweaked to fit our own style. BTW, today is a day for running but unfortunately it’s raining. I decided to give this method a try, low stakes obv. I played two shoes, winning both, stopping at +3 for a total of 6 units. not bad for a boring afternoon! lol

Good strategy coupled with an interesting MM. it allows you to increase your profits capitalizing your winnings.

this should be watched after #5, as it is an evolution of the method explained. Still thinking it’s worth it!

Interesting technique. Not new as #5 but it has some merit. I like his playing mirror/no mirror style. Dislike the MM. IMO better to rely on 2iar rather than 3.

the aim of these videos is to get open minded discussions on arguments I selected all over the web and that’s i find interesting. so any comment is welcome. this bs seems to perform quite well and surely it’s worth goimg deeply, to catch nuances and develop some tweaks. A

Agree with you. This bs seems to have a nice hr as it works within the edges of 87% solution. Obviously a streaky shoe is a mess, but you can take countermeasures.

In this video you’ll find a totally brand new bet selection. It’s tricky at first but when you get it, it’s quite easy to catch the side to bet. It’s interesting also because it has a good hitting rate. I’m thinking to our brave Plus2 players. I dislike instead the MM because even if it has some merits spreading the drawdown to 4 players, when one single column hits poorly you can get into troubles. You could find yourself with a positive hitting rate but losing money, due to the losses in this column. So I’ll focus on bet selection that offers many interesting points to analyze deeply. A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRGqpE428h0&t=28s Another good one. It’s a simplified version of MvD. IMO is a good backbone for any system creation. A

Variance (apart ourselves) is our worst enemy. Ppl that can’t handle V will lose every bankroll. We must lose to something. Put this in your head. You must work on your game, practice a lot, refining it, more and more... but you’ll lose to something, NO WAY! So why put all this effort into a game where I’ll end to lose? Never say that. You need to learn how manage V. How? The first way is to cut off your losses, analyze your scorecard trying to find reasons for a no bet. Usually ppl bet too much decisions. 10 to 20 are more than enough to get profits. Don’t use progs. If you cannot win flat betting, you cannot win, period. Another way is to build solid stats. Try to play your A game, track and build your stats. After any session compare your current and past results. Those stats are the bricks of your confidence in your play and will dictate you how and when make some adjustments. When you play your A game you must be focused on placing the best bet at this time, no more. Results are consequent to your choices and your skills; if you play it well and lose, IF YOUR DECISION PROCESS IS CORRECT, you no need to be worried, it’s just the aleatory part of the game. Stick to your plan and go on. Good results will come. A

Nice method for Naturals lovers! ehiiii Canababacc, still there?

For those interested in stats, these videos are very enlightening. Absolutely useful to understand the math of the game and events behavior. As usual, those datas are useless unless you put them into the general picture, but they could be very useful in your decisions making process. A

it’s interesting to notice how the flow switches from 2liners B to 2liners P around mid shoe. if you get these switches promptly you can get some easy units. A

Interesting video from andrei i love the concept that the strong side produces more multiples and the weak side produces more singles or 2s. i think it should be the base for any successful approach. IMO the approach above could be tweaked in this way: a) starting a reset point when the strong side flow switches from a side to another b) instead taking the row majority between P and B, as we’re interested on that side behavior, IMO it’s far more accurate a singles/multiples count for each side. it gives you a better picture of the flow. a mere PB count could be misleading, especially in case of long runs that effect the count, and successive singles or short multiples, thing that will lean you betting in a weak situation. comments are welcome A

...when and where I started my gambling career! ...and still alive and kicking!

I admit that your writing is a bit smokey to me, anyway, what's the question? In my opinion the stop loss and win must be fixed looking at solod previous stats and proportionally to your avg results. I mean, a stop loss must be set near your point of no return, always checking your previous stats, to avoid making your losses bigger and bigger. Your stop win must be set to avoid giving back your (hard) wins. stats dictates your values. when you set them, stick to them, no exceptions! A

y, the forum that "cannot be named" anyway, for the last time, I don't want discuss the value of this strategy but the fact that someone promotes his site with the name of Norm; thing that I find unacceptable! A

hey, Kim Kardashian was with me last night!

we can discuss about this approach, but not in name of Norm, PLEASE!