dweezel7

It stinks with carcinogenic crap floating everywhere, the people are creepy, the house hates you, if anyone is nice to you, they want money, it's boring and you have to keep the Jedi mindset every second you are "in theatre" to pick the anointed table. My point is that it's a pain in the ass to fight Vegas, even if you could win consistently, so it better be worth it. All I want to do is fly in, make $10,000 in a week or less and get the hell outta there. What do I have to do to do that?

There must be many people here making a living from gambling. Please share your story about how you can count on wagering to make a living and what it took to get there. Thanks.

The only reason I mentioned teruya is because he at least had the guts to try a risky promotion like "If you don't make your sign up money back in 30 days, I will give you a full refund." Contrary to popular belief, I am not interested in raining on anyones parade. Of course I would like to be in the parade, but haven't found a way to do it. Might be because I'm too: dense, impatient, right-brained, (add your reason). Or it might be because this is impossible to do without risking the farm. I mean making a living at this, not treating it as entertainment at the $5 table. $100,000+ with zero risk. The basic question anyone who is selling a way to "beat the casino" should answer satisfactorily is "If you are so good at this, why do you need me?" If a system seller is really interested in helping people learn to do this, they will have to upgrade the curriculum, tools and attitude. Video, webinars, live skype training like mark did is good as well. As it is mow, it feels like a chat room for accountants, where only the CPA's know what is really going on and anyone else is forced to wade through endless lists of jargon in an attempt to separate the signal from the noise. If they don't understand something, they haven't "worked hard enough" or they have a "bad attitude" Is the risk removed from the game by system 40 or any system? If not, how much of the risk has been removed? If the risk has not been removed, I am still gambling, and I have no interest in gambling. Please answer this question: The main problem with evaluating any system is: _________________________________________ The answer is "the sample size is too small". martingale is an example of this. if it works for a year, playing 3 hours a day, can you count on it to pay your mortgage?

tried system 40 worked well until it didn't

Dice control? Now that's something that could easily be proven, yet no one has. That would be because it's bullshit. OK guys, you have found the "secret to riches" by beating the casino. Since you are so good at this, why don't you challenge yourselves and take a experienced but losing player and turn him into a lean mean money machine? Teruya took a chance and challenged players to "get off their asses" and join his program for $1,000. He guaranteed their success. Not one participant make thier $1,000 back and Teruya fought the credit card chargebacks like the professional sociopath he is. I have a friend that took the GOYA challenge and was dicked around by Teruya for 2 months til he final forced Mark to refund his $1,000. My friend is dedicated and got little help from anyone. Get him making $1,000 a day and you will have something. Otherwise, you are just blowing in the wind with claims that few can verify.

The wizard of odds http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/bettingsystems.html says that it is impossible to beat the casino playing a negative expectation game. Does anyone here have proof that anything works to beat baccarat or any other game? Proof to me is: A verifiable simulation showing a win rate of at least 1 unit per shoe for 100,000 shoes or more. Thanks

clifton! such language. By the way, I have a bachelors degree in physics with a minor in mechanical engineering. why do I keep coming back? Because I'm just as delusional as you guys are. I am snapping out of it, and when completely lucid, will never bother your fantasy again. the only thing I ever wanted was some proof that anything works. thats what i asked for here when i joined in july and thats what i asked for from maverick. thanks to seahog for being the only player at marks site that had the guts to post numbers. no proof, but at least numbers. I think he said 283 shoes with a 10 unit per shoe average. What are the numbers now seahog? Anyway when someone finally posts proof here or anywhere else, I will go away. Hows that for motivation? contrary to popular opinion, I get no pleasure from shooting down other peoples fantasies. I have wasted a lot more time that 6 months on this, I just have spent the last 6 months concentrating on Bac. Of course, the owners and administrators of this site are angry with me, but I must insist on proof. Proof is not: "i made 53 units in one shoe", but verifiable, independent proof, with at least 100,000 shoes. "We have our own test facilities, thank you." is what clifton said. that's like Merck testing Vioxx. Might be a little conflict of interest. Imspirit has no agenda, and he has done a tremendous amount of research for no pay. yet he has found exactly zero systems that work better than betting bank all the time. does anyone here have the guts to post real numbers? Number of shoes played, average win-loss per shoe. Please, no bullshit. Have a nice day.

I really don't want to rain anyones parade, but there is no way to beat the casino playing a negative expectation game. No way, no how. I spent 6 months trying to do it. Even if you find something that has promise, you cannot get a large enough sample size to count on your method. Unless you want to spend 8 years breathing carcinogens from that Taiwanese guy on your left. Just got banned from "Maverick Marks" site, where he was so bold as to guarantee everyone would make their $1,000 fee back in a month. Didn't happen. Not one person made their money back. I called him on it and he banned me. You may notice that there are no "professional" negative expectation game players. That would be because it is impossible to win. The past has no influence on the future. See gamblers fallacy: Still dreaming of that yacht paid for by Steve Winn? This guy may test your system, method, technique, or magic bean: Let me know when your method makes it past 100,000 shoes. I'll alert the media.

I've been just playing around online and I ended up in vegas, so i tried out a fibonacchi. Lost, but not much.

My goal is to make $500 a day. I understand that I should join the private forums to learrn how to play effectively. I have played Baccarat about 6 hours total. My questions are: 1. Can I do this online? I am in Boise, but can travel. 2. How much time and money (assuming I am average) will it take to become good enough to make $500 a day? 3. Which system is the most likely to succeed? I know you cant answer that here. Is it obvious when I join the private forum, or are there a dozen systems that I will have to learn? 4. Will anyone be available to help me? Thanks!

thanks for responding to my post. Sorry to use the word "shill", but I have lost a lot trying various methods at craps and have become a little jaded. My bankroll (for now) is $1,000. can I get anything done with that?

I have been reading what the Wizard of Odds says about betting systems: http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/bettingsystems.html He says that there is no way to beat the casino in any game. I see that several people on this site claim to be winning consistantly and am wondering if this is real, or just more bull from shills. I would like to win, of course, but have no interest in gambling per se. I have been browsing around this site and it is very confusing. How can I really beat the casino? Is there a system here that actually works and what do I have to do to learn it? I don't care what game it is. I will join the private forums if there is really a chance to win consistantly. Thanks!