MrEvo

Really interested in Sports Betting. Can you show us how? Thanks

I have a Player Banker Variance question. We all know that Banker wins out number player wins but I want to know how far out of balance toward player can a sample get before the draw advantage take over. Do you think it is possible to have a sample that would go +50 player (with flat bets) without Banker ever being ahead or even at any point?

I have a question I saw on someone post about their being two SAP charts one for the P and one for the B. so do I keep two of them or just one?

I am sure this has been asked but in the first two RD1 examples posted this is from post number 1 straight down when you lose the bet under a 1, 2 (under a 2 in a row that immediately follows a 1 in a row). in the first example from post 2 hand 15 shoes straight down betting after a 1-2 but in post 3 hand 56 is under a 1-2 but was not played sraight now the bet should have been on P but was placed on Banker

I am new here also but the the count is the easy part look at the last out come it is FTL then you have a - number PPPPP would give you a -4 every time it chops you add a +1 so PPPPPB would give you a -3 simple enough There is more than one BS that is used and for you to know which one to use you need to know if the shoe has more streaks or chops thus the reason for the count if you have a - number like in my example you can see there is more streak than chop to the sample No matter what system you play there will be a pattren to beat you. The idea is that in any given sample some patterns will happen more than they should and some will happen less often than they should. example a shoe is heavey in runs of 2 . So we track the runs of 1-2-3-4 and change the way we bet to fit a pattern that is not showing up in that show that is why you need to track it The first step would be learn how to get your OR count step two would be learn how to track the runs in a shoe of 1-2-3-4 that is what we call the SAP chart. learn that then report back

So a + OT count says play OTB4L. A - OT count confirms F2. The count with the highest number is the count we should go by. Sometimes its OR. Sometimes its OT 1.now just to be clear a + OR count calls for system 40 ? 2.And what do we use for a - OR cout? (RD1) 3 Now what I would like to know what are we calling a strong enough count Do we select or system after any of the counts gets to 8 . That seems to be the way 40 indicates in the PDF 4. Also with the sap chart lets say we have a 2-4-0-0 count that would be for the 1-2-3-4 cuplits I feel this is to soon to really pick the LC f to start play. runs of 4 counts for 8 on the chart so even if they are LC they can make up groud fast. So would we not keep changing our LC though out the shoe? so how much of a gap in the count do we need to see to pick the LC?

While this shoe has an overall -2 OR count the OR count actually hits -15 in the 3rd col. This points directly at our System 40A streak component systems RD1 or F2 and rules out 40 completely. So now the question becomes WHICH streak system? Well, we know that RD1 hates 1's so RD1 is ruled out right off the bat. We also know that F2 LOVES both straight and ZZ runs as well as sporadic 1's and this shoe is chock full of all 3 right from the get go. Even if you had no clue at the beginning of the shoe it starts with a ZZ run of 5 followed by a straight run of 7. A half way alert player would be onto F2 somewhere during the straight run of 7. But a shoe this streaky does not come out of no where. It is highly likely our player would have been onto F2 even BEFORE this shoe began. here is were I get lost 1 were can I find this F2 system? 2 this wast taken from the 40 manual A - OR count means we start with one of our two streak systems. This will usually be RD1, 2 or 3 but in low twos or low 3s we can start with F2 or F3 respectively. In a Neutral OR count (hovering 0) we can start with System 40N or OTB4L. so does it take a -8 count to make use use one of the streak systems? 3 does the 40 advanced replace the need for the 40N part of the system? 4 do we really need to change systems I thought our sap chart would keep us out of trouble?

First I would like to say that I am sorry that I posted my questions in the wrong spot . I thought that system 40 and advaced system 40 were to diffrent systems I have played other systems that were somewhat close to this system traked with the neg and pos like 40 does and I had seen the U1 D2 M2 progression before Here is my next round of questions If I understand We will always start off a shoe with N40 (unless you had been tracking the shoe before and have a count that tells you other wise) and that is very similar to OR, net betting Opposites vs Repeats, except for you OTR bets. Then when we get OR counts that go beyond + or - 8 we call “super strea (-) or super chop (+). Then we stop net betting and use Streak We play 4.2 - 2s are culprit. Chop We play 4.3 if 3s are LC or 44 if 4s are LC. depending if we had a +or -8 IF I have all of this down if your count goes to lets say -10 then dips back under 8 would you go back to N40?

1. 4. If you win your OTR bet: A. 42 - Stay OTR until you lose then go right back to opposites with a 1 bet B. 43 - Stay OTR for 2 winning bets * C. 44 - Stay OTR for 1 winning bet (or one losing bet) I don't understand this part what is a 42 is that talking about a run of 4 then a run of two like PPPPBB also I don't understand Streak We play 4.2 - 2s are culprit. Chop We play 4.3 if 3s are LC or 44 if 4s are LC. I understand about 2's being the culprit but don't get what 4.2 stands for and the 4.3 in 4.2 2 is the culprit but what is the 4 for. my thrid thing I would like to ask is on the MM if we bet 2 after every 1 unit bet then when we go to the 2-3-4-5-6 progressiondo we bet 3 after every 2 unit bet and treat the 2 unit bet like we did the one unit bet in the other progression