Jump to content

BacPlayer

Legacy Players
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

BacPlayer last won the day on September 23 2016

BacPlayer had the most liked content!

About BacPlayer

  • Birthday 05/05/1976

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

BacPlayer's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • One Year In Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

11

Reputation

  1. Hey xdotnet,

    for the 1>2 trigger it's about 3 continuous events without a 1 in between. 

    Like 234,333, 242,323 etc 

    basically saying we can bet 1 unit on 1 becoming a 2 ie 2nd liner

    you can reach me at

    bacplayer1@gmail.com

    thanks

  2. Hi Kevin,

    I am trying to access the posts in Premium members forum and it says i dont have access.

    Could you please check?

     

    Thanks

     

  3. Hello experts. Have you seen the movie 21. For folks who don't know or not seen it's a classic movie of the blackjack card counting invented by MIT students and later took Vegas for millions. Watch it if you have not done so. There is a mathematic probability game situation in the movie where the students are presented with 3 boxes. The student is allowed to pick 1 box contains which contains gold and you are given only 2 chances to get lucky. One student (the hero) selects the Box no 1. The teacher reveals that box no 2 is empty. He immediately switches his selection to box no 3 as his choice of selection. Because it has a higher possibility. Don't understand why. I have a nagging question. All the triggers point to Banker bet in blackjack. And then we hit a tie. Should we switch to Player by the above anomaly? I know we don't care about Ties in BTC.But what would you personally do if you have to with gut instincts.
  4. I saw this on the "public bacarrat forum" posted by Brad. Thanks mate. It is never necessary to use either mode - everything is up to you Modes 2 and 3 as per the manual were designed to allow you to sustain either 2 losses (mode 2) or 3 losses (mode 3) and still continue playing the method you were playing When you follow a bias you are going to at some point sustain a loss The question is do you think that the loss was just a deviation and therefore the bias will continue? How many losses in a row do you keep betting that the bias you are trying to follow will return? Or do you reverse the theory and go OTR (follow the change) Its all determined by what you see as consistent events happening. Of course murphy's law says you will sit back and choose a mode and as soon as you bet - the event that you have chosen to avoid will come up! What sort of progression are you using if any? As for a streaky shoe are you referring to TBL or F / SS ? Its all things you have to consider Like this Quote
  5. Hi Trillion.. thanks.. always greatful for experienced folks sharing their perspectives. This was my confusion too... In some posts i see some mention of s40M1 and understanding of modes in the NOR as proceeding to the next level. so what if you do when you follow a method and lose 1 hand.... immediately go OTR? or do you continue until losing the second hand.
  6. Fellows. I am confused with the modes. I am sure this has been discussed way too many times in he past. Please bear with me. When too many 2's use mode 3 when too many 3's use mode 2 are there any any other triggers for this. When to go mode 1. When too many ones ? what are your triggers?
  7. Hi Keith, can you please post the links to me as well? Bacplayer1@gmail.com thanks
  8. Trigger to use RD1 - many repeats likes the ZZ, TT and 212. Exit trigger like any other system - lose 2 hands, wait/paper bet lose 3-4 quit. Or look for the next opportunity.
  9. Also I have combed through the site and not able to find the w2f rules for MDB+ and SS,ZZ variants of the same. Could you please point me in the right direction? Thanks
  10. Brad/Pando/XDotNet/CT70 Thanks for your inputs. This is great forum and everybody is very helpful. Having read through the NOR and now the MDB + and SAP methodologies. Isnt MDB and SAP opposite of the same event. NOR+SAP is optimistic perspective (expect the same event are going to repeat as the previous shoe history). MDB+ is a pessimistic view (the same event can't repeat 5 times continuously) Is it correct that we can't use both these systems in the same shoe and get caught on the wrong side doing so. Let's say you are using s40 because of high 1's and 2's and less 3 or higher and suddenly the shoe changes. When does it warrant an abandon of NOR + SAP and move to MDB+ and vice versa. Am I over complicating these stuffs? I want to KISS. ( keep it simple and sweet) From previous posts of oz I think he favors the NOR + SAP Way2Fast uses MDB+ Does these systems have a meeting point. When does 1 end and the other begin. Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use