Jump to content

Baccman

Users
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Baccman

  • Birthday 06/04/1965

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Baccman's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

5

Reputation

  1. Yes, i was thinking 2 failure of MC event, first time when it fails you stop betting, if it wins next time you bet on it again, if not, you stop.
  2. SAP is good but like PJ said you just need to be consistent and when MC starts to fail its time to stop and thats after 2nd bet lost. Also cards dont know is thet beginning of the shoe or middle, so why would something that was MC at the the beginning of the shoe continue through the whole shoe, when it starts to change maybe it is next new MC event just like last was at the beginning of the shoe...also Ellis said many times that Norm played SAP and RSAP.... and maybe Norm saw that something starts to fail other event will catch up. Bacc
  3. Have question about overall SAP and recent SAP events. If we have 3s like MC and then we get section of 2113121. 3s are still MC but we have 2 2s in the last 11 play. Are 2s now new MC because of recent history or we are looking overall SAP? This 11 plays are not so bad OT section, but no strong OT trigger in it. Maybe it will go to strong OT mode but i am interested will it become 2s dominant or it will continue with 3s Thank you Bacc
  4. What i really think is that there is no mechanical trigger that will give us better then 50% hit rate. To get better then 50% on any event you need to support it with some recent history. Just my 2 c
  5. Didn't pay close attention of %, but i saw that 221 hits more often then 222, that was little wierd to me because i think that Norm trigger for OT was 221...but if you back up it with some recent history and SAP maybe it works better. Think that PJ can give some advice about this.
  6. Results that i have got are from fully mechanical test...i was waiting first 4+ and then when that run is over i play that every 3 will go to 4 +, and i do not stop on that event, i play that every 3 will go to 4+ untill the end of the shoe, unless there is 3 ×3 then i quit. Didnt pay attention if 3 is MC or LC i just played mechanical , and i got same results like Pando. To me is interesting that we have same result from diferent shoes. Now i am trying to see is there any way to increse this %
  7. Personally i dont like to use NP. Would be happy if we can work our way with flatbet and achive better then 50 % and like that we can use larger units with less risk or we can use loop 1 2 since you said that this way wins almost 70% of all bets
  8. Ok, we have 93 % winning triggers using this rule...i 60 shoes that i have tested it was 130 triggers and 122 of them won...that means that after first 4 + there was not 3×3 after it. If we were using 1 2 4 NP we would have won 122units and lose 8×7 = 56...that means 66 units for 60 shoes....some of this shoes were very short and sdnt had any trigger... if someone is happy with score he can play like this...Pando and i have same result from different shoes, it means that you sholud get same on tour shoes. NOW, big question is... do we need to stay on the run all the way...i think that we can use this rules...we can go on the run all the way if 4+ is stronger then 4, also go on the run if 4+ are not stronger but run have gone to 5....then do not bet if 3s are MC by 3 point spread and stop to bet when you see 3×3s. Any oppinions ? Baccman
  9. Its just for streaks....i wait 4+ and then i bet on every 3 that will go to 4+ untill i see 3 ×3 then i quit...its like pando said.... 93% of the time there was not 3 ×3 after first 4 +...i didnt checked ZZ but i think that they are not as reliable as streaks
  10. Yes thats something like my question in first post. If we have more 4 then 5+ maybe we should bet it just for 1 unit. But if 5+s are stronger then 4s then we sholud stay on the run. And also it depends on tour position in the shoe.
  11. I just checked 60 shoes using your rules and i got 93 %, now the question is is it better to stay on the run all the way
  12. If we go on every STR or ZZ run untill it ends afer 4 only if there was prior 5+ , and not if there is more 4s then 5+s, can we do better then 50 % on the long run ?
  13. IMO there is no consistency in any event count, only thing that i have noticed is that 1s are usually average. And also there is no casino that is always low in some event. You cant just sit there and play s40m1 cuz you saw that that casino is low on 2s....take 50 shoes and you will have 50% 1s 25% 2s ....... so that casino is not always low on 2s you can just find shoes that favors to s40m1. So that means that you need to follow the shoe. No mechanical system that works, you cant sit there and say i will play this. And yes you damn need it to KISS, just follow the shoe, but sure you will lose some cuz they will keep changing, but like we said we need little bit over 50 %. And also damn DISCIPLINE, only thing that keep pulling me back. Also too bad that PJ, Zebra, OZ are not active, this forum is not same w/o them.......Norm RIP.....what a legend.
  14. Shoes at dublinbet are ALMOST always low or average at 1s. I have played many times at the night when they had 7,8,9 1s mostly sporadic. Also not many shoes where LC & MC will handle whole shoe.
  15. Hi guys did anyone saw when do they bring new cards at blackorchid and dublinbet. And did they favors to s40 and otb4l first few shoes or they are not predictable. Cheers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use