Jump to content

Goong

Legacy Players
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Goong

  • Birthday 09/26/1971

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Goong's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Pretty easy not to read the thread Jersey, not sure what forces you to read the dam thread I'm sorry Andy & Jersey but I dont accept the comments from Rinaldo about M. Where I am from we look after our friends, close or far away. It appears in the good ole US of A u do not. I do not apologise for backing up M
  2. Once again, you refuse to confront the real issue and try to divert the debate by attacking the man and introducing irrelevant argument in an attempt to re-write the history of the circumstances that led us here. So, I'm happy to play the game but the bottom line is you made false, unfair and unupported accusations against someone who you know nothing about and you refuse to retract your comments. Its a madmans view of reality that you have! I have never seen him attack "Ellie" never once trou du cul May be true, I am not American, pretty easy to confuse nationalities when reading text now isnt it? My clues were your nick name but YOU as per usual just assumed!! You assumed I was American. I am far far far away from America No you attacked the man, you called him a scammer and a thief..got it?? There is a good reason Ellis removed your thread, it was a disgrace, everyone was having a go at what you said and you had no support ..but you continue. And I laugh in your general direction Mr Frenchman! Mate I have a permanent hard on. You are wrong, plain and simple and now you are showing your true assholianism By the way, something struck me as funny today. In the event that you "win" this debate, and that, lets be honest about it, is looking increasingly unlikely. But IF you do, it will be the first argument the French have ever won, in war or peace time!
  3. That is irrelevant to this debate. You had no personal knowledge of the circumstance of the absence nor the ability of the person to even make a post to members. You were merely hanging around. Not sure what for. You had NO right to say what you said, make the suggestions about the mans character that you did nor insinuate the things you said in more than one post on more than one forum And to set the record straight, it is YOU who cried "free speech, I can say what I like" when you were told to be quiet until we knew the facts, not I. I am trying, without success it seems, to explain why you needed to STFU until you knew the facts. There are a number of circumstances that I can think of that would prevent a person from making a post on a forum. There are also a variety of scenarios that I can think of that push the priority of a post on a forum down the list. Sometimes other things require our attention and matter more than to bother responding to the cries and whimpers of people who would not "piss on me if I was on fire". The people who invested their money did not appoint you as their speaker, nor would they. Most had the sense to wait until they had more information before commenting. The fact you had not invested gave you even LESS right to have your say and certainly does not give you the right to attack someones character as you did. No, it bothers me that you spruik on about free speech but wont accept the responsibility that comes with it. Free speech does not give you the right to make baseless claims and comment on events and situations you have no knowledge of. It is YOU that cried, and I'm paraphrasing here "This is America, I can say what I like". (note carefully that I have to paraphrase here because your thread was removed due to your attack on that person without evidence and a complete lack of support for your comments. Does this tell you anything??) I am telling you that that is a piss weak excuse for attacking someones integrity with no evidence of the accusations you made both directly and in your not so subtle innuendo. It's got nothing to do with MY maturity, its got to do with basic ethics and YOUR inability to handle the responsibility of free speech. And now it seems, your own lack of character being unwilling to accept you were wrong and make amends by making a public statement of apology for your very public comments. In the country I was born in and those I like to visit, killing someone requires more than an apology to even begin to pay for the crime, no-one is asking you to do any more than is correct and appropriate. I dont have to forget or forgive anyone. All this started when you began attacking someone without any right to do so, I merely stepped in to tell you to pull your head in, but you continue to crap on. It may not be a big deal for you, but if the shoe was on the other foot and someone was posting false claims about you in public forums, I'm sure your FRENCH blood would be boiling and you would be screaming blue murder. Double standards. I am guessing you are telling me to relax and chillout? You wont find many more relaxed and chilled out than I am right now, so I neither need your permission or advice on what to do and how to do it. You on the other hand seem to require some work to get up to and maintain normal levels of decency. There is nothing sincere about what you say, its just all about you. Once again, I tell you that if you want free speech, which was your catchcry when you were told to stop talking, you need to use it appropriately.
  4. Well maybe you are not a father, cos if my kids were seriously sick the last thing I would care about is a Baccarat Forum, where all the information is there for MEMBERS to see anyway. Sometimes other things take priority. It would have been a waste of his time and energy to post as people will read what they like into it anyway. I find the fact you can sleep so well at night after attacking someones character/integrity, with NO EVIDENCE, when they are not around, quite astounding. I still think you owe an apology for your baseless rant With freedom comes responsibility. That is not debatable.
  5. Well Rinaldo, the man is back after serious health problems for his child. I hope you will apologize sincerely to him for your premature ejaculation! Understand free speech yet and the importance of having your facts straight before opening your gob?
  6. This is an excellent question and one I too would be happy to see the answer Also in reading through the myriad of posts I got the message that you were now separating SAP for player and banker. Would someone mind explaining this a little? Also is there a bank of shoes somewhere with the correct O/R and SAP count so it can be practiced and checked? Some of this is coming back to me (the frustration included)...slowly. Could someone also tell me the progression we are using 12345, 23456, 345? Also, when do you consider LC appearing? Is it after first SAP event or after 4 SAP events? On top of this Im not sure how to apply this now we have separated SAP on P/B sides. It seems possible, in fact probable you will have different LC on both sides (which I guess is the reason for it) but how to apply? What happened to maverick?
  7. Crown Casino - Melbourne Australia (Teak Room) 17/10/08 B4422431 B342222221 B12234111113 B2322331
  8. Goong

    No worries buddy......I can see why u misunderstood.

    I agree with you....it doesn't matter how much you help some people they don't give a crap!

    Regarding your system ..does it have anything to do with this website. it's intrigued me for a while but my Maths brain tells me its not possible!

    (cant link to external websites in this forum for some reason) s

  9. Mate, the system sucks and you know it. BTW they are very big on litigation and would be eager to pursue anyone they thought was selling the system. Now I dont intend letting them know about it cos I think what they sell is a rip off but I dont think you should perpetuate the problem by reselling it.

    Merely by capturing the file you have broken a number of copyright laws and even if the system doesn't work under law they can legally pursue you and form what I know of them, they will

    So I didn't want to make this post public as I don't think we need a public argument BUT I think you should be careful not to get yourself into trouble either by having a pissed off purchaser or a pissed of copyright holder

    The likelihood is that if the purchaser finds the system is bad (and they will) they may contact CBI themselves

    Im trying to be reasonable so dont send back a pile of abuse..its advice only..do with it as you wish!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use