Users ECD Posted March 22, 2017 Author Users Report Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) The are multiple problems with most/if not all of E's theories: He uses cookie cutter language to market them. Ellis promises the world to you presenting this grand illusion that you will be walking away + a gazillion on almost every shoe. And by the time you figure out his game, you are in for a lot of money. Ellis' HG systems are like computers. The latest HG system will be obsolete (LCNB) by the end of the year only to be replaced by the new HG system. Those of us who have been playing for a few years or longer are wise to the game already. I am sure that the top players here will echo the following: None of us would be the player we are today if it wasn't for Ellis, but it is Ellis' doing that put Ellis where he is. As far as MvD, there is a way that you can use it but it is not in the manner intended. Instead of using SS as the question, ask yourself this: Based upon what P or B is showing you, WILL THE 1 STAY 1 OR WILL THE 1 GO TO 2? The one thing that I found in this kooky journey called Baccarat is that the less you have to ask yourself the better you are. PBPBBPBBBBPPBBBBBB With the above, there were two 1P's without a 2P. If there is a pattern of two sequences iar then it may be a good bet that the third 1P will stay (Red P). The second and third sets of B's were multiple B's. At the start of the fourth B sequence, it may be a good bet that the 1B will go to 2 (Red B). As with everything, if you take the time with anyone's method and "Swing your own swing" (RIP Arnold) you can tailor it to fit your needs. Edited March 22, 2017 by ECD change 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.