-
Posts
50 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by kingstar
-
-
Hi Ellis,
In the MDB+SAP thread, you stated this rule: "For every event(s) a shoe is high in, the shoe MUST be equally low in other event(s)"
I am not quite sure what it is about. could you please elaborate it a bit more?
Thanks
-
Would like to ask when using SAP count as an indicator for MDB play, which way is more effective: to use the MC event or to use the LC event?
I was thinking to use MC event. For example:
1. if SAP count for 1s is highest, i will play 3zz goes to 4zz but not 3zz stays 3zz
2. if SAP count for 2s is highest, i will play 2s stays 2s and 3s stays 3s, but neither 2s goes to 3s nor 3s goes to 4s
3. if SAP count for 3s is highest, i play both 2s goes to 3s and 3s stays 3s, but neither 2s stays 2s nor 3s goes to 4s
-
I think you can send an email to Keith to request for it.
-
In my opinion, after re-shuffle, every shoes should be seen as an independent shoe, we cannot consider previous shoe's last result as the previous hand of current shoe's first hand.
-
You should have done alright with MDB on these? Thanks for the practise shoes
Hi brad01,
I have tried to practise the shoes Pando posted with both MDB and NOR. MDB does not have many signals but can win just a few units in most of the shoes (I use three occurrence of events), while play NOR will win much more units in most of the shoes without big draw down.
-
BTW guys, Kingstar did in fact join the NOR private forum. Maybe you can get him to come back here and give you a REAL idea of what goes on there. But he'll be pretty busy for a while. There is a LOT to learn.
Master Ellis,
You are right. I have been quite busy for the past few days. I've read many good post in the private forum and think about how i can apply those method into my play while playing the real shoes posted by other members. It has been a great learning experience.
For those guys who are serious about playing baccarat, i will say:
Joining the private forum is just the first step, if you want to really improve your play, you must spend time to learn those method or system designed by Ellis. And practise a lot before entering casino to beat it
Regards,
Kevin
-
After joining the private forum for less than 2 weeks, i am slowly building up the system that meet my risk tolerant level through reading those valuable post by our master Ellis and other members. In this 2 weeks, i learned more than what i have learned from the public forum for the post 10 months since i first joined BTC (although for the first few month, i was still in doubt that can i really beat casino?).
I wish that one year later, i can also start a thread like MVSeahog to say that i have win some money as compared to one year ago
Regards,
Kevin
-
Well, for PBPB I'm thinking S4 at least to start. Both S1 and S4 love 1's but S4 bets less and gets on long ST runs sooner. They both bet the same (S1 and S4) starting out. Then we see what 2s are doing to decide the issue.
Initially i don't quite understand why Ellis recommend S4 for PBPB. Now after going through some thinking, i think i might get why Ellis say so.
Just to share my thought here (all comment are welcome): We start S4 for PBPB, once we see the first confirmed 2s or 3s, we can switch to normal S1 (if 1s is still the highest). This way it reduce the loss caused by 3s and 4s although it get less profit for the first 2s, play this way it is of much less risk.
Regards,
Kevin
-
try looking up sap counts. might be in there.
thanks, Brendan
I tried to search for SAP counts but did not get what i want. I think 3zz run should be same as 3s which occurs once every 16 play but just not sure whether it is correct or not
-
Hi Paul,
You'are welcome. We learn from each other. I can practise and learn from your shoes.
Regards,
Kevin
-
Correct Kevin, 4's occur once every 32 hands but that's not really the question. We win on 4 or mores. So the correct question is how often do 4+s occur?
Every 16 plays on average.
But correct, we need to think twice before betting on an event that only occurs once every 16 hands. We can win the game W/O taking such big risks.
While losing a 3 bet prog is the worst thing that can happen to you, the second worst is not having enough shoe left to complete a prog.
Some have suggested completing a prog in the next shoe. That is very risky business because a new shoe resets all of the probabilities. Best to simply avoid betting on 4 or mores altogether.
Hi Ellis,
Thanks for the correction. I will follow your suggestion to avoid betting on 4 or more altogether.
-
Hi Ellis,
Could you please provide on average, one 3ZZ, 4ZZ or 5ZZ occurs in how many plays?
I can't figure it out by myself. Thanks
Regards,
Kevin
-
Duplicated post................
-
Hi Ellis
As requested here are some shoes from Baccarat touch games from New Zealand
I have not identified the triggers as I am still playing the original MDB+
rules (with 6 bets), and I do not want to confuse anyone.
Shoe: A
B111324431
P111211131125
P131143512
B4151
Shoe: B
B2221113133
B32422311
B664212
B154
Shoe: C
P133421123
B11114121133
P3113213141
P1114
Shoe: D
B7142132
P122122122131
P1131131151111
B11211
Shoe: E
B1111513413
B11111614121
P1311133221
P2111333
Shoe: F
B4211211242
B311313211121
B111113311111112
P15411
Shoe: G
B122115121113
B12111522141
P11221212321
B41222
I am interested to know what you think of these
Shoe D has multiple 2's predominant
regards
Paul
Hi Paul,
For me, if i see 2 4s+ event appears in the very beginning of a game (which mean under pure random case, there should be 8 2s and 4 3s followed it). I will expect that there will be quite many 2s coming out later. So the best is to apply 3 2s event then bet on next 2s go to 3s (which is same as use 3 2s event to bet the next 1s stay 1). Although you may lose the some opportunity, but you will reduce the risk. Only after 2s events normalize (for example, there is in total 4 2s event, i may consider to use back 2 2s event then bet on next 2s go to 3s)
Regards,
Kevin
-
Thanks man appreciate the comment. I'm still up 4k so the loss wasn't everything. I stick to my stop loss.
I've been playing for a while but this is the first time trying this level up plan. Just not sure if I should play again at $100 or level back down and rebuild...
In that case, i think you are doing well. You should believe that you are doing with the correct system (already proved by your previous plays). and stick to your initial plan. In worst case, you lose nothing.
-
So after winning countless shoes and well above the "required" next level up in the ladder, I decide to level up to $100 min. And. I lost. Terrible feeling after doing SO well for so long.
Bad luck I guess. I think I may have waited too long to level up. Do you think it's better to level up quickly or to build up a few buy ins at a certain level? Anyone have any suggestions?
Hi ztomsk,
So sad to hear that you have done so well for a long period but suddenly encounter one big lost. I am just a new member so i don't think i can give any useful suggestion.
But based on my experience in forex, the win rate of you trade is not the most important winning factor, but the risk that you take to win certain profit matters most (i.e, the stop loss). So if you can consistently control your stop loss (do not take more risk after you see a high win rate), i don't think you can encounter big loss. As i remember Ellis did said he did not bet big using his own money, but he will bet big with casino money.
Regards,
Kevin
-
Correct and well said. But see, I told you. Kevin will be a great student! Look at the questions he is already asking after just a few days on the forum.
Hi Ellis,
Thanks for your encouragement, It makes me to fill up with full energy. Actually i was trying to capture those useful information in the forum and try to digest in the past few days. This is a quite painful process as it is actually not easy to understand some of the system. But this learning process benefit me a lot now. I am still having a lot to learn. Although i have understand MDB+ rule by reading your post, i believe there is still a lot i need to find out (which will lead me to register for MDB+ members later to learn from you on the math fundamental of those system you designed, and why they can work). Anyway, i still need to prove myself first in casino before starting the next step. I will try my first MDB play in Macau in 2 weeks time. Before that, still have to learn hard
Regards,
Kevin
-
I don't play the 5ZZ as you describe. Sure it may work in any given shoe, but I want to limit to patterns that will have time to repeat a few more times in a shoe. A 5ZZ, just like a straight run of 5, may not give me up to three more betting opportunities in the shoe. For the same reason, I usually pass on a 4 (run or ZZ) after about hand 50 or so.
We'll said, way2fast.
From what you said, I can see that you are very good at math. Your idea to pass on 4 (run or zz) after about hand 50 is great. Just my guessing (not sure correct or not), as 4s event happens every 32 play, after about 50 hands, if we failed the 1st bet, we are not likely to see a 4s again in the remaining play of the shoe. The core of the MDB+ Is based on probability on random shoes, we risk a maximum 3 tries to bet that 5 kinds of a event won't happen (a very low happening rate).
So for 3s stay 3s, 3s to 4s, or 4s to 5s, actually we should define that after certain plays, we will pass on betting ( not because that we will lose, but because we only have a very low chance to see it happen)
I think way2fast's idea can be even written into the MDB+ rule
Regards,
Kevin
-
I have received a couple PM's asking how to play MDB+ on mackem's shoes, so here is an example for one of the games he posted. I initially just went through his list and in a few minutes could identify the MDB+ signals and whether each one won or not. For the attached shoe, i wrote out all the plays and marked the signals just like i would in a casino. I chose this shoe because it has several signals, both for streaks and ZZs. This shoe had 8 signals, and each one of them won for a 42% PA.
Hi way2fast,
Thanks for posting you MDB+ Play. I learned a lot for your play
Do you consider the following when playing MDB+ (since Ellis said there are as many zz runs as straight runs) :
1. After two triple 1's bet the next double 1's stays double? If we apply that, we will be able to add one Win bet of Banker at play 28
2. After two triple 1's bet the next triple 1's goes to 4 1's? If we apply that, we will be able to add one Lose bet of Player at play 28
Or when there are so many 1's (most likely 1's will be highest), we should use MDB rule S1 to play
Best Regards,
Kevin
-
Deleted..........
-
Dear All,
I am ready for my first posting. Here is the program and please read this entire posting before use. This is not yet a fully completed version. I am saving the final combined betting until after enough members have tried out this first version MDB Auto Betting Program with modification and suggestions necessary. Then my wish is to perform a poll of opinions on how should we combine our betting of all different Progs (S1,S23,S4+ and SAP or more to be added) into one straight and robust winning prog. Please try out the program and let me know how you like it and or have it modify to perfect it.
Programming Notes:
Programming conventions (Important, must follow to understand how program place bets):
1. When a betting entry is MINUS (-) betting is on BANKER.
2. When a betting entry is PLUS (+) betting is on PLAYER.
3. If a bet wins highlight is RED, if a bet lose highlight is BLUE.
4. When you copy and paste any data into Column B, please make sure you paste it with the “Paste Value” option.
Program Prog selection Switches:
1. At Columnn Y Row 2, there is a program switch set up highlighted with RED fill. You may set this value for varies program play option:
(a) Switch value = 1: Only S1 and SAP will play
( Switch value = 2: Only S23 and SAP will play
© Switch value = 4: Only S4+ and SAP will play
(d) Switch value = 7: Auto switch between S1, s23 and s4+ with SAP played
(e) Switch value = 8: Only SAP will play
(f) Switch value = 9: All Progs S1, S23, S4+ and SAP will play
Programming defaults:
1. SAP count does not include first event.
2. Betting starts as soon as play #3 for all S1, S23 and S4+.
3. SAP does not start betting until after 6 plays.
4. SAP posting is immediate as soon as 4s or plus is confirmed. This means 4s+ event will establish and enter into SAP table as soon as 4s emerges.
5. First version of program will bet 5s+ stays on 1st appearance. Subsequent betting will rely on previous streak length. All 7s or above continue to 1 lose.
Programming Definitions:
1. When system switches to S23, there will be at least 2 bets played before any further switching. This is because S23 is really designed as a 2 or more bets system.
2. 1s high means SAP1 > max(SAP2,SAP3,SAP4) – S4M3 is played with SW=4.
3. 1s becomes high means [(current SAP1 > last SAP1) and (SAP1 = max(SAP2,SAP3,SAP4)] –> S1 is played with SW=1.
4. 2s high means SAP2 > max(SAP1,SAP3,SAP4) –> S23 is played with SW=2.
5. 2s becomes high means [(current SAP2 > last SAP2) and (SAP2 = max(SAP1,SAP3,SAP4)] –> S23 is played with SW=2.
6. 3s high means SAP3 > max(SAP1,SAP2,SAP4) –> S23 is played with SW=2.
7. 3s becomes high means [(current SAP3 > last SAP3) and (SAP3 = max(SAP1,SAP2,SAP4)] –> S23 is played with SW=2.
8. Ellis Notes – Once S23, mode 2 or 2 plays must be made before any further system switching is allowed. Meaning SAP1 has not bumped up by 2 and at the same time SAP4 has not been increased.
9. 4s high means SAP3 > max(SAP1,SAP2,SAP3) – S4+ is played with SW=4.
10. 4s becomes high means AND [OR((current SAP4 > last SAP4),cSAP>=4),(SAP4 = max(SAP1,SAP2,SAP3)] –> S4+ is played with SW=4.
11. When 1s and 2s are tied –> S1 is played with SW=1.
12. When 1s and 3s are tied –> S1 is played with SW=1.
13. When 2s and 3s are tied with none of them being zero –> S23 is played with SW=2.
14. When 1s and 4s+ are tied -> S4+ is played with SW=4.
15. When 3s and 4s+ are tied -> S4+ is played with SW=4.
So please play with it and have fun!
Very Best Regards,
AYS
[ATTACH]3028[/ATTACH]
Hi AYS,
I want to thank you for providing this excel simulation file. It can help me to understand MDB in an easier way.
Btw, have you already came up with a version 2?
Best Regards,
Kevin
-
Hi Kevin. Wizard of Odds and baccaratonnet are two sites I use. Wizard of odds tends to be more random where baccaratonnet not. But for practicing, both are good. Hope you can make the NOR Boot Camp--- we will have lots of live practice and can help you learn the ins and outs of NOR.
Steve
Thank You, Steve. when will be the next NOR Boot Camp conducted?
-
Hi Ellis,
I got two new questions after reading the NOR manual again. In page 15 of NOR manual, it is stated that:
But, with OTB4L you lose to both to both Straight AND ZZ runs so both run types must be considered separately and you must go OTR on Both run types after either 2 or 3 losing bets against both run types
But recognize that you can easily be in one Mode for one run type and the other Mode for the other run type
So if my system is OTB4L and i was to use SAP count to decide which mode to use, i would need to keep track of both the count of straight run (4s vs 5s) as well as the count of zz run (4s vs 5s)?
For example, if currently there is only one straight run 5s and one zz run 4s, when i lose 2 bets to 4 in a row, i will use mode 2 to bet straight OTR.
Then later when i lose 2 bets to a zz run of 4s, i will use mode 3 and need continue bet one more time OTB4L, if i lose the third bet, then i will bet zz OTR, is that correct?
==================================================================================================
Updated on 7 Nov 2014: I figured out that the answer to my question is Yes. We need to keep track of both the count of straight run (4s vs 5s) as well as the count of zz run (4s vs 5s)
Best Regards,
Kevin
-
I like Dublinbet.com pretty good site.....But you might want to get a program so you can start at your own pace then speed up , theres a lot of info to digest when practicing and you want to take your time .
Hi topstep1,
Thanks for your recommendation. I will note it down
Regards,
Kevin
how to beat this shoes
in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Posted
Hi Ellis,
Count me in too. Looking foward to it