Jump to content

Baccplay

Legacy Players
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    77

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Baccplay

  10. System 40 Advanced

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted · Edited by Baccplay

    Good Job Jersey! Right, the OR count started right out strong minus and ended up -9. For the same reason I selected F2 (new rules) with a 345 limited prog. With a count this strong its hard to go wrong either way. This table had likely been a minus count table all day and an F2 table all day. But RD1 was also an excellent choice since you didn't see your first 1 until play 9.

    I quit with +42 at play 66 with a 3 bet due. (Don't go below the decade you are in in the last col.)

    My worst position was -2 at plays 30 and 34. No other dips into minus territory. Straight F2. No need to post it. Very simple! The new rule worked beautifully every time. No 0 bets - I played every hand to play 66.

    Baccplay, how did Maverick do?

    Ellis, unfortunately this is not a minus count table or F2, it was choppy and neutral until this shoe comes along. I played Maverick Ultimate using the 234 progression (go back to 2 if I lose the 4) and I ended up +61, started at hand 17, which I got in late and played all the way til the last hand. My worst position is +2. Too bad I didn't play this shoe using the 345 prog or else I can easily win over 100 units which I never need to bet more than 5 units!

    Anyways, the new Sys40 Advanced did good on this shoe too.

    Baccplay

  12. How to Win

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted

    Ha, let me say this too......What a Maverick Day! :cool:

    Played 2 shoes today.

    First shoe is a really strong Maverick shoe and since I'm a very very conservative player, I flat betted the whole shoe and score +21.

    Second shoe is a little tricky but Maverick Ultimate just handles it perfectly fine so again, I flat bet and by hand #40 I'm up another +10 and it's time for me to go home and relax. :tongue:

    More to come...

  13. Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted · Edited by Baccplay

    They won, you lost. Mark does not want my help. You seem to be implying that I don't contribute enough. Very strange. I have 3200 posts on this forum plus another 10,000 on WinningWays which was the name of this forum before Keith changed it. Plus I've published 13 books on the subject. Mark has 675 posts and you have 126. My post avg about a page in length . The avg Bible has 1272 pages. If BTC had a dollar for every hour I've apparantly wasted on the phone with you trying to teach you something it would be the biggest month BTC ever had. I even sent people to your casino to help you. They told me you were hopeless. You gave me impossible playing conditions to work with. Nobody can win under those conditions. I told you that up front. Plus you have a severe gambling problem. Well, you are Mark's problem now. I'll only take so much abuse for a dollar an hour. If you'll excuse me I have important family matters to attend to.

    You are correct, you have tons of methods here, each can win if apply correctly. One thing that you don't know is, I've been winning consistently and I've won all my money back from the days when you taught me how to beat my casino, but sadly it's not something you teach me. You did help me a lot before but one thing that you don't know is, I got countless email saying that you are not contributing enough to the forum, and even have doubt if you can ever help improving whatever is available here. You spent all your time in BaccaratForum to get members here only wanting to learn Maverick. If you know Maverick needs improvement, why are you waiting til now to suggest? And now you are accusing us that we don't need your help? What an excuse?

    Plus who the heck did you send to my casino to help me? The only one that I've met in this forum came to me to learn SAP where you are having trouble fixing it. I haven't called you in months now and all you remember was the trouble I had BEFORE I used to called you regularly. Do you know why I don't call you anymore? It's because you don't keep your promise, you know what I'm talking about.

    I helped you test tons of systems in the past but none of them hold up, I won't be this mad if I'm totally disappointed on you. Is this how you treat your customer?

  14. Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted

    Ellis, I know exactly what my local casino is doing and trust me, my experience on SAP is no lesser than PJ or Andrea. I know we'll need to switch when certain counts from the SAP chart is hinting us but how many of the members here can do what you said? Just because a few of us can do it doesn't mean everyone can do it. I know there are still certain members that have joined your forum for couple years now and still having trouble with SAP. Is this what you want, to develop and sell some systems that only a few can play?

    As with your idea now, how long does it take for your idea to turn into something practical this time? Since you are the master and with the most experience on Baccarat, isn't it you should already have something in mind which is playable before you throw out your idea?

  15. Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted

    Ellis, I've posted up one shoe for you to demonstrate. In case you missed it, here's the shoe again:

    B1122171131

    B5121121214

    B21113151212

    P123

    Plus, SAP is not perfected. If it is, there will not be more versions like SAP-Hybrid, NU-SAP. You get kill if you play SAP on neutral shoes. Please note, I'm talking about the SAP when it was developed 2 years ago and claimed that it's finished.

    Anyway, I think we are all dying to see a sample shoe from you Ellis.

  19. Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted

    No, Ellis, don't back out now. From our conversation today you said Maverick can be improved twice as good as is now. Please show us the improvement, we are always looking for something better. If you think the SAP chart can help the switch on Maverick or even switching to something better and avoiding losing 3, 4, 5 or more hands in a row, I think we are all dying to see this improvement.

  25. RD1 | N Discussion and Rules ECD Group February 22, 2010

    in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack

    Posted

    Hey PJ,

    I don't understand why in the beginner you are betting opposite RD1 on banker unopposed? Isn't on hand #4, RD1 hand should be on banker and you should actually make a 1 unit bet on player? I'm kinda confuse on how you suspend bet sometimes when it loses to 2 and sometimes it loses to 3. Don't get me wrong, I understand the rules, but not sure what is wrong with it at this point.

    Baccplay

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

  I accept