Baccplay
Legacy Players-
Posts
77 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Baccplay
-
4D Simulator / Analyser
Baccplay replied to PeterUK's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Hi Peter, Thanks so much for providing this worksheet. It gives a great analysis on all 4 counts. Nice work. Thank you! Baccplay -
Online Casinos
Baccplay replied to LOU30's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Anyone knows a good and reliable online casino with live dealer where it has Canadian currency as well? Apparently bet365.com have just stopped offering live dealer to customers based in Canada for no explanation. Any suggestion would be great. Thanks. -
Online Casino
Baccplay replied to Baccplay's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Thanks MVS and wolfat, any other members? -
Hi All, I know there are some members here play solely online. I just want to know which online casino with live dealer is the most reliable. Some of the ones that our members play are: -- BetPhoenix -- Dublinbet -- Dafa888 -- Bet365 Anyone play online can share?
-
Ellis, unfortunately this is not a minus count table or F2, it was choppy and neutral until this shoe comes along. I played Maverick Ultimate using the 234 progression (go back to 2 if I lose the 4) and I ended up +61, started at hand 17, which I got in late and played all the way til the last hand. My worst position is +2. Too bad I didn't play this shoe using the 345 prog or else I can easily win over 100 units which I never need to bet more than 5 units! Anyways, the new Sys40 Advanced did good on this shoe too. Baccplay
-
Here's an interesting shoe that I encountered tonight from my local casino. Ellis and whoever is good with System 40 Advanced, please play this shoe and post the result. I would like to know the result based on this new method that we have. B5313112112 B113112344 B741131111 B312232
-
Ha, let me say this too......What a Maverick Day! Played 2 shoes today. First shoe is a really strong Maverick shoe and since I'm a very very conservative player, I flat betted the whole shoe and score +21. Second shoe is a little tricky but Maverick Ultimate just handles it perfectly fine so again, I flat bet and by hand #40 I'm up another +10 and it's time for me to go home and relax. More to come...
-
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
You are correct, you have tons of methods here, each can win if apply correctly. One thing that you don't know is, I've been winning consistently and I've won all my money back from the days when you taught me how to beat my casino, but sadly it's not something you teach me. You did help me a lot before but one thing that you don't know is, I got countless email saying that you are not contributing enough to the forum, and even have doubt if you can ever help improving whatever is available here. You spent all your time in BaccaratForum to get members here only wanting to learn Maverick. If you know Maverick needs improvement, why are you waiting til now to suggest? And now you are accusing us that we don't need your help? What an excuse? Plus who the heck did you send to my casino to help me? The only one that I've met in this forum came to me to learn SAP where you are having trouble fixing it. I haven't called you in months now and all you remember was the trouble I had BEFORE I used to called you regularly. Do you know why I don't call you anymore? It's because you don't keep your promise, you know what I'm talking about. I helped you test tons of systems in the past but none of them hold up, I won't be this mad if I'm totally disappointed on you. Is this how you treat your customer? -
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Ellis, I know exactly what my local casino is doing and trust me, my experience on SAP is no lesser than PJ or Andrea. I know we'll need to switch when certain counts from the SAP chart is hinting us but how many of the members here can do what you said? Just because a few of us can do it doesn't mean everyone can do it. I know there are still certain members that have joined your forum for couple years now and still having trouble with SAP. Is this what you want, to develop and sell some systems that only a few can play? As with your idea now, how long does it take for your idea to turn into something practical this time? Since you are the master and with the most experience on Baccarat, isn't it you should already have something in mind which is playable before you throw out your idea? -
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Ellis, I've posted up one shoe for you to demonstrate. In case you missed it, here's the shoe again: B1122171131 B5121121214 B21113151212 P123 Plus, SAP is not perfected. If it is, there will not be more versions like SAP-Hybrid, NU-SAP. You get kill if you play SAP on neutral shoes. Please note, I'm talking about the SAP when it was developed 2 years ago and claimed that it's finished. Anyway, I think we are all dying to see a sample shoe from you Ellis. -
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
MVS, I think it's time for you to demonstrate your skill on Maverick, if you have time, please play the shoe I posted so that others can see. Thanks so much. -
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
I don't have a scanner so I won't be able to post any shoes. -
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Ellis, for you to start, here's a shoe from my live casino. It can easily score +30 to +40 playing both Maverick and Maverick Ultimate without losing 3 hands in a row. Please use this shoe as a start to demonstrate how you can switch consulting the SAP chart. Visual is always better than words. B1122171131 B5121121214 B21113151212 P123 -
Bet Phoenix "Cutting it short"
Baccplay replied to nizm0racer's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
No, Ellis, don't back out now. From our conversation today you said Maverick can be improved twice as good as is now. Please show us the improvement, we are always looking for something better. If you think the SAP chart can help the switch on Maverick or even switching to something better and avoiding losing 3, 4, 5 or more hands in a row, I think we are all dying to see this improvement. -
Hi All, Yup, it's true. I'm the person that made +30 units with Mreteuya today and made +90 units in the last 3 days. Maverick system is very easy to play and it can win long term. All the details are in the private forum. Just come and see. Baccplay
-
U.5D1 Progression Testing Thread
Baccplay replied to Plasia87's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Plasia, You said you are capping at 3Hi. So do you go back to 1 when you lose the 3 and continue with U.5D1? Baccplay -
U.5D1 Progression Testing Thread
Baccplay replied to Plasia87's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Hi Plasia, Please let me know if I'm right about the U.5D1 prog: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 is the entire progression, if 3 loses, go down to 2, then if the 2 loses, go up to 2.5, if 2.5 loses, go back down to 1.5 then go up .5 until you lose the 3 again? Once again, this is a very interesting prog compare to U1D2. Baccplay -
U.5D1 Progression Testing Thread
Baccplay replied to Plasia87's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Hi Plasia, When you are using U.5D1, do you base it with 1 or .5? Also, what is the lowest score when you play U1D2 and U.5D1 on the shoe you have posted? Thanks, Baccplay -
Hi Tom, Can you please this shoe using your way like you did on post #124. Thanks a lot! P2112511111211 B2213311241 B4213114211 P41212213 Baccplay
- 176 replies
-
- anti rd1
- up 1 down 1
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hey PJ, I don't understand why in the beginner you are betting opposite RD1 on banker unopposed? Isn't on hand #4, RD1 hand should be on banker and you should actually make a 1 unit bet on player? I'm kinda confuse on how you suspend bet sometimes when it loses to 2 and sometimes it loses to 3. Don't get me wrong, I understand the rules, but not sure what is wrong with it at this point. Baccplay
- 176 replies
-
- anti rd1
- up 1 down 1
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: