Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Baccarat Hall of Fame Member

Here an interesting bet selection that intrigued me, by Patrick from Sweden.

 Sputniks Optimal March
We narrow down the Red & Black outcomes into three formations.
Singles are one event by itself
Series of two are one event by itself
Series of three and higher is one event by itself
The Formations
Number 2 stand for a series of two.
Number 3 stand for a series of three or higher Number 1 stands for singles
222 W
223 W
221 W
232 W
231 W
233 W
211 LW
212 LLW
213 LLL <<< Triplet
333 W
332 W
331 W
323 W
321 W
322 W
311 LW
313 LLW
312 LLL <<< Triplet
That is 16 versus 2 favouring our selection.
The March
1. You wait for the first series to show then bet that it will follow by a new series.
2. If you lose you bet that you will break even with two singles - see formation table
3. If you lose then you bet against the triplet and if you lose you have three losses.
4. If not you continue betting series follow by series.

 Illustration
R
B
R
B
B
R RW R
B
RL
BW
R
B
R
R
R
R
R
B
BW
R
RW
R
R
B
RL
RL
RW
B
R
B
R
R
B
BW
R
BL
BL
B L <<< Triplet R
R

 Extended Fibonacci
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 4 5 6,5 8 10,5 13 17 21 27,5 34 - (Air Ball Machine & Online Casino) 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 13 16 21 26 34 42 55 68 - (Real Casino at minimum tables)
Last March Rule
When you get a triplet you can wait for a new series to show and start over Or you can continue after the current present series
Personal I testing both solutions
With this part, you need to make up your mind about the decision making At the moment I use a new series and continue with the march
YouTube Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3sdOlSMdQU Cheers Sputnik The Gambler
 

  • Like 1

bacclover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Wolfat  I tested this on several shoes and it seemed to work well . Also played with small units on baccarat and roulette and it was successful winning from 2 to 10 units in 10 sessions . Thanks for posting this method , It is low stress and you get to sit out much of the time . Allan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baccarat Hall of Fame Member

allan22,

agree, is a nice method. I’m only concerned about MM, too wild for me.

Sometimes I play it, but spotting good opportunities, skipping some plays that I think are out from the current trend.

A

bacclover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@can we make a video of this on a Baccarat Shoe @wolfat I am not quite grabbing it 

 Is this how you bet it? Since you defined the last number in the series I am assuming the next winner has to be an opposite and bet it is that correct?

For example a 2 2 2 is BBPPBB{P) The last event of an unknown length...

B222 

BBPPBB

Hand 4 bet Player Win

Hand 5 bet Banker WIn

Hand 6 Bet Banker Win

*******************************

B221 

BBPPBP*

Hand 4 Bet Player win

Hand 5 Bet Banker Win

Hand 6 Bet Banker Lose

********************************

212 

B212

BBPBBP*

Hand 4 Bet Player Lose (bet for a 2)

Hand 5 Bet Player Lose (bet for a 1)

Hand 6 Bet Bet Player Win ( Bet for a 2)

********************************

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Join us in Vegas for the Back to Vegas Seminar

at the Crescent Dealer's School

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith a series consists of 3 events . A losing series has a single a double and a 3iar or more . A winning series has 2 singles or 2 2iar or 2 3iar . We place a bet to get one of those results . If there is a confirmed 1 then we bet for a second confirmed 1 . Same for a 2 iar , bet next 2 iar stays 2iar . If we have a 2iar and a 3iar bet next 1 goes to 2 . If it wins we have 3 events and no 1 . The way I play is when a new series starts , if a P I wait to see if it is a 1 or a 2 or a 3iar . If a 1 then bet next 1 is a confirmed 1 . If a 2iar bet next 2 iar stays a 2iar . Hope this helps clarify things . Allan22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baccarat Hall of Fame Member
13 hours ago, Keith Smith said:

@can we make a video of this on a Baccarat Shoe @wolfat I am not quite grabbing it 

 Is this how you bet it? Since you defined the last number in the series I am assuming the next winner has to be an opposite and bet it is that correct?

For example a 2 2 2 is BBPPBB{P) The last event of an unknown length...

B222 

BBPPBB

Hand 4 bet Player Win

Hand 5 bet Banker WIn

Hand 6 Bet Banker Win

*******************************

B221 

BBPPBP*

Hand 4 Bet Player win

Hand 5 Bet Banker Win

Hand 6 Bet Banker Lose

********************************

212 

B212

BBPBBP*

Hand 4 Bet Player Lose (bet for a 2)

Hand 5 Bet Player Lose (bet for a 1)

Hand 6 Bet Bet Player Win ( Bet for a 2)

********************************

It’s quire easy when you get the betting placement clear in your head…. :)

1) wait for a multiple event, it could be a 2 or a 3+

2) when this event is confirmed, bet repeat for another multiple

3) if you lose the above bet, it means that a 1 showed, now you bet for another 1 back to back

4) if you lose the bet on 1, it means that you have a multiple not yet confirmed. So take the latest multiple and bet accordingly.

    I mean that if it was a 2, you bet opposite to get another 2; if it was a 3+, you bet repeat to get another 3+.

5) if you get your multiple, restart the procedure, if it’s a 1, wait for a multiple appearing and restart

 

your sample:

2-2-2

p

p

B next  bet for a multiple

B won. now wait for the end of event

p next bet is for another multiple

p won, wait for another event

we guess it continues with 

B

p

B

p

p here you get a multiple, wait for the event confirmed and start cheasing another multiple, as above

hope it’s clear now

 

13 hours ago, Keith Smith said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bacclover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baccarat Hall of Fame Member

 

It’s quire easy when you get the betting placement clear in your head…. :)

1) wait for a multiple event, it could be a 2 or a 3+

2) when this event is confirmed, bet repeat for another multiple

3) if you lose the above bet, it means that a 1 showed, now you bet for another 1 back to back

4) if you lose the bet on 1, it means that you have a multiple not yet confirmed. So take the latest multiple and bet accordingly.

    I mean that if it was a 2, you bet opposite to get another 2; if it was a 3+, you bet repeat to get another 3+.

5) if you get your multiple, restart the procedure, if it’s a 1, wait for a multiple appearing and restart

 

your sample:

2-2-2

p

p

B next  bet for a multiple

B won. now wait for the end of event

p next bet is for another multiple

p won, wait for another event

we guess it continues with 

B

p

B

p

p here you get a multiple, wait for the event confirmed and start cheasing another multiple, as above

bacclover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I've looked it over a few times. It looks refreshing, a new approach for me, quite interesting and perhaps fun. Perhaps you can drop your personal feelings about the theory behind this approach and the odds. Also, what progression did you use in the past when you played it? Can you give a couple more detailed examples? What type of approach are you playing these days? 

 

Cheers 🙏

Edited by Clint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baccarat Hall of Fame Member

It’s pretty clear to me, just follow the instructions:

212 LLW

PP (no bet here, wait for the first series to show)

B (bet next decision for another B - bet for the series followed by another series) 

P Lost (bet next decision for another single to break even)

P Lost (bet next decision to confirm the 2iar; otherwise you get a series of 3+, so a triplet)

B Win

So this is the LLW

 

The others work same way, trying  to skip triplets.

 

I remember I used the P.I.P. progression in this spot.

I posted the description in the site.

A

bacclover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Users

Whoa, Patrick nailed the Sputniks Optimal March! Talk about a roulette strategy that's got more twists and turns than a rollercoaster. I'm all in for the singles, doubles, and triplets drama, it's like the roulette version of a blockbuster movie. The 16 versus 2 odds got me intrigued - it's like we're playing a high-stakes game of roulette chess. And that Extended Fibonacci sequence? Air Ball Machine to Real Casino? That's a journey I didn't know I needed, triplets dropping like a beat! Do we hit pause, grab some popcorn, and wait for the next series, or do we dive straight into the ongoing roulette saga? Decisions, decisions! Now, about those Crazy Slots Casino new games – are they as wild as this Sputniks Optimal March? Count me in for a game night that's crazier than a squirrel on espresso.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use