maxfli52

MVS Thanks for the reply Actually the results were from an internet site (Bodog) that most likely used a RNG. Still with +6 I was happy with the results. I am using U3Hi/2Hi as a starting point to learn and understand some method and then move on to other more complex methods that are listed on this site. Maverick has caught my attention but there is much I do not understand at this point to be able to follow Mark's program in detail. Any suggestions you have on how to progress through the various methods would be helpful. Thanks again

I would be interested in your webinar - agprudhomme@gmail.com Thanks

MVS Looking for some feedback. I played 10 shoes in the internet using U3Hi/2Hi with the following results +14, +34, -5, +15, -4, +11, -13, +20, +7, -13 This is a net avg of +6.6 units per shoe. I played these mechancial with the following exceptions; I exited if I hit the same positive results twice in the third col and exited at -13 on loosing shoes at any point I hit 13. My question is if these were played in a live casino vs the internet would I have had better results. I am assuming that the internet play would have been, by nature, random and the casino results would have been non random based on shuffle machines or hand shuffle, etc. Also by playing the internet there is no opportunity for table evaluation before playing. Your thoughts are appreciated !!!

I would be interested in the webinar that you describe. Thanks

I checked out Black Orchid and realized taht they use 6 decks not 8. Does that change the approach that BTC uses> Nice holidays to all !!!