Users KIDDO Posted October 24, 2011 Users Report Share Posted October 24, 2011 (edited) I've had a few members ask me if I would take a deep dive into this system and see how viable it would be in the long run, so this will begin a 100 shoe test to see how it fares across hand picked shoes from different types of situations from extreme OT to T, heavy +CS to -CS counts etc. Here are the results of the first 25 hand picked shoes. This is for informational purposes only and to provide information to those who are interested in seeing how well this will fare across a series of shoes. Rules are the same as posted by Andrea with no variations except for when you switch to AD you play as if it was a new shoe (starting with repeats until you lose one) as well when you switch you wait for 1 paper win before proceeding with a real bet.[ATTACH]2183[/ATTACH]Across 25 ShoesW/ No money management8.20 Units average per shoeTotal profit of 205 Units88% Shoe win rateW/ 15 unit stop win 10-12 unit stop loss7.28 Units average per shoe182 units total profit 88% Shoe win rateW/ 8 unit stop win 10-12 unit stop loss5.84 Units average per shoe146 unit total profit92% Shoe win rateLooks good so far, those who're looking for results stay tuned to this thread as I will post in groups of 25 Edited October 24, 2011 by KIDDO Summarizing data chart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Files Posted October 25, 2011 Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 Hi Kiddo,This looks very interesting! A question I have is why are the shoes hand picked rather than just whatever shoes come along? It seems like it would be more viable as an alternative if the shoes weren't handpicked and just whatever shoes came up next. Of course, I may not understand the reasoning behind it so please forgive me if my ignorance is showing. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Users KIDDO Posted November 2, 2011 Author Users Report Share Posted November 2, 2011 hand picked to include different types of situations where extreme counts reverse, where there are no consistencies, the types of shoes people usually lose on where a system will hit -20 or a system will hit +20. I no longer spend anymore time in a casino then I have to where I just record shoes, when testing a system I test it against these 25 shoes and if it fails, then in my eyes its not worth my time to continue the current testing. Each shoe displays a typical situation you would encounter some examples,a very high OT count to a very low OT count w/ no consistent LCan OT count hovering zero w/ no consistent LCsame as the above 2 but with consistent LCsStrong SAP 40 shoe Weak SAP 40 shoeStrong matrix shoeWeak matrix shoeStrong F2 shoeWeak F2 shoeStrong RD1 shoeWeak RD1 shoeMulti trend shoes w/ no consistency in sap chartmulti trend shoes w/ consistencies in sap chartextreme +/- cs count shoe reversals These are examples of hand picked shoes that cover a variety of situations that you wouldn't normally see in live play in 25 shoes you would see these more along the lines of 100 or 200 shoes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.