Users brad01 Posted January 10, 2015 Users Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 P21121121141121113112P22112312752115313= -1 my playP32127211221312112222P12311421211221127= +5 my playAverage +2 per shoe with 1 losing progression in shoe 1They were pre-shuffled and at the time I thought they looked pretty tough - didn't actually play for real but recorded them and played them on paper and actually came out ahead as per aboveNot sure if they look like great for MDB+ due to all the 1's and 2'sThere was heaps of chinese players there crowding the tables and overall looked like they were losing pretty bad!Any comments or other players results? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefAurelius Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 P21121121141121113112P22112312752115313= -1 my playP32127211221312112222P12311421211221127= +5 my playAverage +2 per shoe with 1 losing progression in shoe 1They were pre-shuffled and at the time I thought they looked pretty tough - didn't actually play for real but recorded them and played them on paper and actually came out ahead as per aboveNot sure if they look like great for MDB+ due to all the 1's and 2'sThere was heaps of chinese players there crowding the tables and overall looked like they were losing pretty bad!Any comments or other players results?Hey mate,Here we go.Brad01 scorecard 15Jan15.PDFApologies, it's messy (sorry I rushed due to time committments); it's not MDB; and clearly in the middle, I got a little lucky.CheersChief Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 P21121121141121113112P22112312752115313= -1 my playP32127211221312112222P12311421211221127= +5 my playAverage +2 per shoe with 1 losing progression in shoe 1They were pre-shuffled and at the time I thought they looked pretty tough - didn't actually play for real but recorded them and played them on paper and actually came out ahead as per aboveNot sure if they look like great for MDB+ due to all the 1's and 2'sThere was heaps of chinese players there crowding the tables and overall looked like they were losing pretty bad!Any comments or other players results?Well, all casinos use "preshuffled" cards. The question is, are these "factory" preshuffled cards???Did they origionally come to the table in a sealed 8 deck numbered bundle?Are they Bee cards?MDB+ is especially for new "factory" preshuffled cards.Next question is how old are these cards? How many shoes have been played using these same cards?While factory preshuffled can produce any shoe type, they usually cause more random shoes than these.At a glance, the first shoe is high in 1's and 2s which is decidedly S40M3. I would bet this shoe U1D2.The second shoe is high in 2s and therefore OTB4L. They will both be high scoring. Give me a minute and I'll play them for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) brad's 2 shoes Edited January 15, 2015 by Ellis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Users brad01 Posted January 15, 2015 Author Users Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Thank Ellis,I think still need more training for NOR and table selection - its coming though.I did think that these didn't look great for MDB+ at the time - amazing that they still came out ahead though!Brad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.