brad01

as u said oz and ct the myth of it all is not how safe the 345 is but the jump u have to make from a base bet to get on it. as ct said a $25 player winning say 4 or 5 bets is up $100 and feels confident so decides to employ a 345 their initial bet is $75 to get on the 345 progression and everyone knows it's when u raise your bets you are at the most risk. if they lost that bet that's wiped out more than half of their winnings in what was a good session. thats psychologically pretty damn hard to deal

the best system Ellis ever did in my opinion is s40

345 = 1, 1.33, 1.67

my idea is: Every well known or long time member who tends to post and start a lot of discussion on the forum has their own thread or blog instead of starting any new topics. I will explain my reasoning in next post. meanwhile: comments?

my idea is: Every well known or long time member who tends to post and start a lot of discussion on the forum has their own thread or blog instead of starting any new topics. I will explain my reasoning in next post. meanwhile: comments?

I thought he would have got on just fine with it !!!!????

I thought he was staying at your joint ?

I wouldn't be so sure ! Yes given he can play baccarat but: Oz reminds me of my dad - still thinks you withdraw cash from a bank by going into the counter, you still get your paycheck in a brown envelope at the end of the week, and the Internet is evil and full of weirdo's crack up!

Jupiters - love it

I thought about this one: you as the player are like a high court judge. you must listen to both cases - banker and player - all arguments for and against. you must have experience and not be biased to make a fair decision. A judge must spend many years in the legal system before they can be a judge

Here is the example shoe posted again showing the pb patterns on top line and then the or and OT patterns below the pb patterns in sync with their occurrence. i got this idea from kachatz and his 4d / 5d play where you track multiple variables at the same time looking for opportunities in all. i could track oott as well and even Ooottt and they would show opportunities but 3 is enough for now. a note that I did not have room to record the last event which is a 1 opposite. also I have written the straight and zz events for each line above them and below them on second line which is confusing but I think you will figure it out (mistake which makes it confusing but they are still listed correctly whether under or over the lines) if if you look at the 2 and 3 clusters in each line I think you will see the betting opportunities

Hi purpleink I did check it and don't belive there was errors but I may be wrong - where I feel you may be confused is the counting of zz 2's: ppbbppbb - 2222 - written with zz events is - 2222222

Hi way2fast. Thanks for reading my post and giving your input I do appreciate that. While I do agree that every decision is either T or OT sounds like a silly statement because it has to be 1 or the other and the same is also true for PB or OR, I do think T and OT differ because they can be stand alone strategies by themselves and will cover every major bias possible fairly well. I don't feel this is the same for PB and OR because if you execute these by themselves they will not cover every possible bias nearly as well IMO. The chart u were looking at was actually the shoe recorded as o and t trends so I did not make it clear by posting it underneath the p and b trends. so for example start of shoe is b113 so that chart shows it in terms of o and t: TOT so I am recording the o and t events in terms of numerical events. i could do the same for o and R as well and look for O v T betting opportunities amongst all 3 variables. hope you understand better. Also interested in ur thoughts on my next posts