waminc
Legacy Players-
Posts
84 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Everything posted by waminc
-
Well, the shoe has been posted up for several hands. My approach would have been to continue with F series, F2 on B and F3 on P (3-2's and 1-3 at this point on the player side, hand 33). It turns out this would carry me through the 2's on P and I arrive at the end of 40 hands with +8...and a 1 bet on B. The temptation is to switch to S40 due to the 1's and 2's coming out, but I will stay with F series with a max draw down at this point of 3 units. Bill
-
You're right Ellis, I should have given more explanation for my bet and prog thoughts. I had considered the 234 earlier if Bank had gone just once since at that point I had 6 winning first bets and one second winning bet. The start of the Bank run, causing me two losses iar has made me hold back until I see a strong first bet win rate again. My next bet...1 on B. Currently +6. Bill
-
Down 1 after the last B...I go 2 units on P. Lose this bet and I will "sit on my hands" and decide whether to continue or drop out of the shoe. I have been experiencing many tough shoes recently at the Grand in Biloxi, averaging about +2 units per shoe. Re-worked 4 of them with ADN and score over 10 units/shoe. I just scored this shoe with ADN and would be at +7 right now.... Bill
-
question about NOR
waminc replied to core's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Witchygal, I would suggest that you do not use a prog at the start of the shoe unless history of the table gives you confidence on what type shoe it is. Start with a flat bet until you are + 3-5 units and pretty sure of the shoe type, then start your progs. Bill -
Any Players in Florida
waminc replied to andy7777's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Hi Davem, I live on the Coast, have played with Kachazt1 when he's come over and would like to meet you if you come to Biloxi. bill -
Hollywood Casino 10.4.2010 bigger
waminc replied to Keith Smith's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Thanks for posting the shoes, Keith. One thing that really jumps out from them is the commitment to a system and then following it throughout the shoe; a comment that Ellis has made over and over again. Jumping systems is most often BAD. The couple of times you made your "course correction" you did it within the first few hands and stayed with it. Very educational. In the first group, S40 in shoes 1,3, &5; F2 in 2&7, and RD in 4,6&8. The second 3 shoes were all S40. Were you able to scout the table(s) before playing? How many tables did you have to choose from? Thanks again, Bill -
Hollywood Casino Shoe 9.14.2010
waminc replied to Keith Smith's topic in BeatTheCasino.com Q and A Baccarat and Blackjack
Keith, I am not seeing any of the shoes you and Ellis played. Do I need to do something different to see the shoes? a new program? Bill I found them on the other thread. No problem.