Guest Posted January 3, 2012 Report Share Posted January 3, 2012 (edited) You know, we have no competition on the internet. Not bragging, just stating an obvious fact. We are the best there is. NOR is the best there is. NO one will ever do better, except maybe us.We are our own competition. If anyone ever improves on NOR, it will be us.I see two possible areas for improvement.One is SAP and the other is first vs second liners.Let's take SAP first. We invented SAP. It is solely ours. No one else even understands it.OK lets take a good OTB4L game. OTB4L likes single or double 1's and 2s and either 3s or 4s.What if we have a game that hits 2 out of 3? It is high in both single 1's and 3s but low in 2s. Very common and still a very good OTB4L shoe. Let's call it a 31313 shoe. That is what it is mostly doing. OK, OTB4L is telling us once the shoe goes 2, bet against the run.Ha, but SAP is telling us wait for 3 and THEN bet against the run because 3s are MC and 2s are LC.Right now we would likely not even notice this because we are winning. But the FACT is, we COULD BE winning twice as much just by paying attention to what we already know - what we already invented. That is ONE thing NORA could do for us.Another is second liners:Look, the OR count can only do 3 things:It can run +It can run -It can hover around 1Sure, there are cases an OR count takes off in one direction only to return to Zero later in the shoe but those cases are so few and far between that they are essentially ignorable. Sorta like 10 in a rows.When we say + count, we could just as well say high in 1's because they are one and the same.When we say - count we could just as well say high in 2+s because they are one and the same.They say that there is no such thing as an advantage bet in Baccarat. The mathematical FACT is, there IS. A - count game MUST be high in 2 or mores and low in 1s. MATHEMATICAL FACT.Therefore, in BOTH respects betting a 1 will go to 2 becomes an advantage bet. If the count remains minus (and it usually does) THAT is the bet we will win the most.Why? Because you can't have an "or more" W/O first having a 2. Plain as freaking day.But the same thing is true in reverse.A + count game MUST be high in 1's and low in 2 or mores. So now the advantage bet becomes bet 1's will stay 1's. That is the bet you MUST win the most often in + count.So what is NOR doing wrong? In BOTH cases we are making our smallest bets on the very bets we mathematically win the most often.Well maybe we are smarter than everyone else. But then, WHY are we being so stupid?Ha, I know what you're thinking. You are thinking: Why are YOU being so stupid?I say this: We gotta fix that!If we are going to be the cutting edge in Baccarat, let's be the cutting freaking edge!So how do we fix those two things? Well the first step is to recognize the problem!Now, for step 2: Edited January 3, 2012 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.