RD1 forum

[KIDDO]

is exposed to the public. just to let you guys know. I don't know if you guys want it to be exposed but just a heads up I can access this forum without logging in

[MVSeahog]

Just tried to log in with a "test" account that is public only and could not get into this forum. It is still marked as "Private".

MVS

[Guest Unregistered]

har har Here i am! its kiddo on a public account!

[MVSeahog]

Aha! Now I see what you're talking about.

Back room work going on now as we type!!

MVS

[ECD]

I notified Keith.

[stonerock]

Hi guys, can anyone briefly explain what are the difference betw rd1, rd1-h, rd1n, rd1-anti...??

[MVSeahog]

Hi guys, can anyone briefly explain what are the difference betw rd1, rd1-h, rd1n, rd1-anti...??

Stoney,

Did you pick up the answer on the other threads?

If not, which one (or ones) are you specifically planning on using? That should make it easier to explain.

MVS

[MrEvo]

I am sure this has been asked but in the first two RD1 examples posted

this is from post number 1 straight down when you lose the bet under a 1, 2 (under a 2 in a row that immediately follows a 1 in a row).

in the first example from post 2 hand 15 shoes straight down betting after a 1-2 but in post 3 hand 56 is under a 1-2 but was not played sraight now the bet should have been on P but was placed on Banker

[ECD]

Probably just a mistake Evo. Or, since we added the 1,2 rule later, it might be because the two shoes were played on different dates.

At that point in time we were playing RD1 as a universal system. With 40A, we are strictly looking at RD1 as a rare special purpose streak system.

But You can still get the 212s in a streaky shoe. I think it best to always protect yourself from them with the 1,2 rule unless the shoe solidly proves otherwise.

[ECD]

I am sure this has been asked but in the first two RD1 examples posted

this is from post number 1 straight down when you lose the bet under a 1, 2 (under a 2 in a row that immediately follows a 1 in a row).

in the first example from post 2 hand 15 shoes straight down betting after a 1-2 but in post 3 hand 56 is under a 1-2 but was not played sraight now the bet should have been on P but was placed on Banker

Probably just a mistake Evo. Or since the 1,2 rule was added later, to protect you from the dreaded 212's, it could be because the two shoes were played on different dates.

Also, at that time we were playing RD1 as a Universal system. With 40A, we are strictly looking at RD1 as a rare special purpose streak component. But it is still a good idea to protect yourself from the 212s.

The only shoe I lost at Hollywood, I lost because I forgot the 1,2 RD1 rule. Right, me of all people!